, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sturgis, P. and N. Allum (2005) ‘Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes’, Public Understanding of Science, 13, 1: 55–74.
Trench, B. (2008a) ‘Internet: turning science communication inside-out?’, in M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, London and New York: Routledge, 185–194.
Trench, B. (2008b) ‘Towards an analytical framework of science communication models’, in D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele and S. Shi (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices, Dordrecht: Springer, 119–138.
Trench, B. (2012) ‘Scientists’ blogs: glimpses behind the scenes’, in S. Rödder, M. Franzen and P. Weingart (eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and Its Repercussions, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Dordrecht: Springer, 273–290.
Weingart, P. (1998) ‘Science and the media’, Research Policy, 27, 8: 869–879.
Wilsdon, J. and R. Willis (2004) See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to move Upstream, London: Demos.
Wynne B. (1991) ‘Knowledges in context’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 16, 1: 111–121.
Wynne, B. (1992) ‘Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science’, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 3: 281–304.
Wynne, B. (2006) ‘Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science: hitting the notes but missing the music?’, Community Genetics, 9, 3: 211–220.
Ziman, J. (1991) ‘Public understanding of science’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 16, 1: 99–105.
Ziman, J. (2000) Real Science: What It Is and What It Means, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.