Gabinsky G.A. in his monograph "Critique of Theological Concepts" writes: "Religious speech, as you know, uses the words of everyday language, putting into them a special, sacred meaning. Thus, the terms "salvation", "redemption", "sin", "revelation" and similar ones are used outside of religious speech, and in this case there is no "sacred" content in them. From the point of view of etymology, there are no purely religious terms at all. For example, it is known that the word "god" goes back to the Sanskrit bhaga, which means "rich", the word "saint" – to "light", "resurrection" – to the verbal root "kres", which meant "carve", etc. They acquire their religious meaning later, when the scope of their use is narrowed and limited area of religious worship and dogma. However, the meaning of words can be very far from their etymological source, and therefore etymological considerations cannot be decisive. When Feuerbach, for example, following Lactantius, believed that the word "religion" comes from the Latin religare – "to bind", and on this basis he argued that any connection between people is true religion, then in this case, as Engels noted, “words are not assigned the meaning that they received through the historical development of their actual use, but what they should have been have by virtue of their origin" (K. Marx and F. Engels, Sosineniya, vol. 21, p. 293). In the same way, whatever the origin of, for example, the word "god" (theos, deus, Gott, dieu, god, etc.), it is clear that its current meaning is religious, but its use in another sense is no more as metaphorical (cf., for example, in Pushkin: "You, Mozart, are God, and you don't know it yourself."). The opposite also happens, however, when words are "secularized", as is the case, for example, in the use of such words and expressions as "thank you", "thank God", "God forbid", etc. "( Gabinsky G. A. Criticism of theological concepts. M., "Thought", 1978, pp. 271-272).
Compare also the Russian words "scrape", "scrape", "scrape", "resurrect", the root "kres" or "kre" is present everywhere. " The Slavic word "resurrection" goes back to the verbal root "cress", which meant "carve" – carve fire, hence the "cross", "spark", "scrape", "kresalo". Determinatives – suffixes of the ancient language period, which joined in the later era to the root of the word and formed with it an indecomposable whole. For example, in the modern Russian language, "r" in the basis of "good" is perceived as part of an indecomposable basis, this also applies to the word "resurrection". … What does science think about resurrection or resurrection (words synonyms)? Theoretically, it is possible. To do this, you need to solve 2 main things: create a "time machine" and the ability to "copy" an individual (man, beast, plant, any object). Here you can avoid the "butterfly effect" described in Ray Bradbury's story "Thunder came" when aliens from the future, tyrannosaurus hunters, who got into the past in the Time Machine, accidentally crush a butterfly, which leads to big changes in the future.After returning to their time, the hunters suddenly discover that their world has changed: a different spelling of the language, a dictator is in power instead of a liberal president. That is, the world of the past remains without transformations, it can only be observed, explored without changes. "(Tikhomirov A.E., Resurrection. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2020, p. 2, 4).