Very confusing. What happened next?
Next, the Particle of God began to allocate islands of itself, which were opposite it, so that it could observe and perceive them. And so the second degree of separation arose. The first, as you remember, was the separation of the Particle of God outside of God so that He could observe it. The second is the separation of a part of the Particle of God outside of this Particle so that it could observe this part of itself. And so on to infinity.
But doesn’t that mean that God can only observe a part of the Particle of God through this Particle of God?
Exactly. And that is why God cannot directly influence a part of the Particle of God, but only through this Particle. And this is the Law of Free Will.
What kind of free will is that if God simply cannot influence this part?
Think about it. This is how the cause-and-effect relationship was born. That is, a part of the Particle of God became the effect, and the Particle of God was the cause of the emergence of this part.
And God could observe parts of Himself only through the prism of these parts, and this is the reflection and movement of Divine Light inward. Everything is similar.
You said that a part of God separated outside of God. Was this part you? Does that mean we are all parts of your Particle?
Yes, that’s correct. But alongside you, other parts of God also separated, and this was what is called the rebellion of the Angels. Did these parts of God also unfold their worlds within themselves?
Yes, the universe is diverse. They created other worlds and systems in their own image and likeness.
Do these worlds intersect?
Everything that has similarity intersects. If you are a millionth reflection of me, then what is your degree of similarity with the millionth reflection of another creator? Do you understand? He and I are particles of God, and in this, we are similar, but then we began to create worlds within ourselves in our own likeness. “In our own likeness” means from ourselves and within ourselves.
But creative impulses are different; just as one artist’s painting is unlike another’s, so the degree of similarity of our creations varies. You have realist artists who try to reflect what they see traditionally. But then cubists and impressionists appear, and other paintings and other creations emerge. This is the prism of reflection. How similar is Malevich’s square to the world around you?